Neverside

Originally posted by annex1:

Originally posted by Popo:

To hell with "tasteful" nude art. The human body is nothing to be ashamed of, and neither is the appreciation of nudity. It's a basic side effect of the human reproductive system. Arbitrary notions of modesty are nothing but artificial roadblocks to some awesome eyecandy. Post it already.

Someone finally said it. Although this may turn into a flame war or a debate. I can think of a few "overly self conscious" females on this site, that tend to press their views on others, mostly because they find themselves "unsexy".

BAHAHAHA. I know exactly who you're talking about.

Originally posted by annex1:

Originally posted by Popo:

To hell with "tasteful" nude art. The human body is nothing to be ashamed of, and neither is the appreciation of nudity. It's a basic side effect of the human reproductive system. Arbitrary notions of modesty are nothing but artificial roadblocks to some awesome eyecandy. Post it already.

Someone finally said it. Although this may turn into a flame war or a debate. I can think of a few "overly self conscious" females on this site, that tend to press their views on others, mostly because they find themselves "unsexy".

Lol,

Originally posted by Popo:

To hell with "tasteful" nude art. The human body is nothing to be ashamed of, and neither is the appreciation of nudity. It's a basic side effect of the human reproductive system. Arbitrary notions of modesty are nothing but artificial roadblocks to some awesome eyecandy. Post it already.

Agreed

Originally posted by Phat_Goat:

Id be fine with vector porn, id just like to see it.

___________________

Lies

We should have a section for members-only that has nude photography. Seriously.

I doubt our friendly neighbourhood admins would go for that.

It's not really that necessary, unless of course it was for tasteful, non-pornographic photography. And as long as an admin frequently deleted images that were considered "porn" versus art.

___________________

Happywebmasters.com Resident Photoshop Expert

Not even for stuff like http://static.flickr.com/47/133645106_1e456449a4_o.jpg or **NSFW** http://static.flickr.com/56/133645526_0023e9f811_o.jpg? BOOOOO!!!!

Those are fantastic examples or what I would consider tastful, non-pornographic photos. Very artistic nude/semi-nude photography.

___________________

Happywebmasters.com Resident Photoshop Expert

on with the nudity.

few things are better than laying around naked.

___________________

:: pop ::

Originally posted by buzz:

Tasteful nudity for the purpose of art is good, as it shows off the human form (and we all know how beautiful it can be), which isnt a bad thing.

sex sells :P

___________________

Graphic Design Wakefield
Web Design Wakefield
Graphic Design Leeds
Motocross Sponsorship

Also a good point.

___________________

Happywebmasters.com Resident Photoshop Expert

well, in the picture that Speed posted, it wasn't the nudity that was even the better part of the picture. I thought the face was much more interesting than the rest of the body, which brings me to another conclusion, the face is definitely more important than the body. The second link that bleedwithme posted definitely is a pretty picture not because of the nudity but because of the face.

___________________

http://www.daggerblack.com || I was Incarnate on TF