Neverside

Site Design

What do you think?

Site

I havent tried rollovers before, and i know there is no content but for the general idea of it what do you think?

___________________

DannyWeb.Org
me@dannyweb.org

<!-- ImageReady Slices (proto.psd) -->

Heh.

Anyway, lighten up the bottom boxes. The title needs more contrast with the header.

Usually, images help a site look professional. (Pictures of your servers, staff, location etc.)

___________________

Oh, yes, this is going to be wild.

ok thanks, whats wrong with imageready, unfortunetly its the only way i know of doing it quickly

___________________

DannyWeb.Org
me@dannyweb.org

to dark.

and theres nothing wrong with imageready. some of the younger designers just havent matured.

id suggest evening out the contrast and looking into more graphics. perhaps a more dominant logo.

___________________

"Pick a new signature!"
Above is where I was censored for speaking the truth behind my warning level.

Webdesign Contest! Grandprize: $950 http://www.tutorialforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=82749

Quote:

Originally posted by jjbennett
to dark.

and theres nothing wrong with imageready. some of the younger designers just havent matured.

id suggest evening out the contrast and looking into more graphics. perhaps a more dominant logo.

Hmm, another comment about my age. :grumpy

Denying that Imageready has flaws is just ignorant.
True, it is fast, quick and easy.
However denying that it has flaws doesn't necissarily make you more mature does it?

To name a few flaws in the program:

1. Its code uses tables
2. Its code is inefficient (all the spacer images)
3. No CSS.
4. Runs in quirk mode (no doctype)

Anyway,

Quote:

theres nothing wrong with imageready

is just flat out wrong.

___________________

Oh, yes, this is going to be wild.

Anything alright as long as it works

___________________

Quote:

Originally posted by eric6889
Hmm, another comment about my age. :grumpy

Denying that Imageready has flaws is just ignorant.
True, it is fast, quick and easy.
However denying that it has flaws doesn't necissarily make you more mature does it?

To name a few flaws in the program:

1. Its code uses tables
2. Its code is inefficient (all the spacer images)
3. No CSS.
4. Runs in quirk mode (no doctype)

Anyway,

is just flat out wrong.

It is a program to make peoples lives easier that does not wish to learn every aspect of website design. You are in the wrong for commenting on their choice of tools. It is very narrow minded of you to attempt to make remarks about their work based on what they use. If you have a problem with it, then it is your problem. That does not mean that if someone chooses to use it, you get to remark about it.

___________________

"Pick a new signature!"
Above is where I was censored for speaking the truth behind my warning level.

Webdesign Contest! Grandprize: $950 http://www.tutorialforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=82749

Well, Josh, you are being incredibly frusterating. This will be my last post here.

The facts remain...
> ImageReady produces flaws in websites.
> Site Reviews is a forum for correcting flaws in websites.
> My comment about a flawed code is completely legit.

Thus, using relatively simple logic, a comment about the creators tools is perfectly legit as long as the tool in question somehow affects the quality of the website, which in this case, it does.

End of story.

Quote:

It is very narrow minded of you to attempt to make remarks about their work based on what they use.

Im not even going to touch that, because it is going to turn out bad. But that comment was just slightly ignorant.

___________________

Oh, yes, this is going to be wild.

You'll begin to understand what I said after you put a few more years into websites. Until then, I don't feel like arguing with what you feel makes you an expert.

End.

___________________

"Pick a new signature!"
Above is where I was censored for speaking the truth behind my warning level.

Webdesign Contest! Grandprize: $950 http://www.tutorialforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=82749

Wow, that looks so stupid, and unprofessional. It's 7 boxes, some that highlight, that look exactly the same. I'd say just make a whole new layout.

___________________

ADSLFAJD;FLAKJDF;LJD RRRRRR AD;FJAS;DLFKAJSDF; RRRRR CHCHOW CHCHOW CHCHOW RRRRRR
- <3 sykil