Originally posted by buzz:and you know because a full dx10 game and partial dx10 game are there sitting on your hd and you've done a comparison with the hardware you have, which you've stated isnt upto the job of playing a partial dx10 or a dx10 game?
Edit, oh, and just incase, the visual jump from dx9 to 10 will not big as big as the dx8 -> dx9 was, mainly due to dx 9 was the first widespread use of shaders and such compared to previous versions, dx10 is only a small improvment in that sense.
There is a big difference between direct x 10 and 9. The shaders are now unified this been one hek of a big difference. No the games aren't sitting on my hd niether, but you will be able to tell pretty easy. One of the reasons it doesn't work on Windows XP is because they started it from scratch. It treats everything differently, from the way it handles the games to the way it handles the dlls and files it uses. The full potential of direct x 10 has not been seen yet, games will be similar on direc x 9 but on dx10 games it will perform better. I have seen screenshots comparing Crysis to dx 9 games. It really hasn't implemented many dx 10 effects just tends to be lighting and colour. Oh and kickboy thanks for the info. Think I might wait for x2800xt, supposed to be faster than the nvidia because its not fully unified on the shaders.
Last edited by chris5050, November 18th, 2006 02:13 AM (Edited 1 times)
