Neverside

Only one way to find out. Test it.

___________________

And the sig ran away with the spoon.

nope, as far as I know 'auto' is relative to the contents and not the height of its parrent. In either case it will not work as in making the columns to stretch as tall as the tallest column though.

Display: table(-something); is how it should have been done (I think) but thanks to browsers that doesn't handle Css1 correct (even though sometimes clameing itself to do so) it can't be used as we would like it to be.

Why not just go with the way that everyone else has accepted as a good choice and solution?

___________________

Neversidian, your staff is broken.

Quote:

Originally posted by Spater
Why not just go with the way that everyone else has accepted as a good choice and solution?

Because I don't understand it, even though I read it all the way through.

Quote:

Originally posted by Spater
Wow, natural! Care to explain that to me? Untill now I thought that the way you could do this without images (which allso would be the correct way many times) whas ruined by IE.:confused:

Do you sit on some knowledge the rest of us don't?

its kinda hard to explain and i don;t really have time to sit down and think about it. but i really dont recomend it either. its like using a flax collum with a few lines of code against not using flax collum and having about 40 lines of code to achieve the same effect...

personlly tho after looking at the site right now. i like how the 2 collums don;t follow go to the bottom. i think it looks good how it is....

Quote:

flax collum

What are you talking about?

___________________

Tables for layout is an abuse. -- Internet Explorer is unsafe.

I think they mean faux columns. :confused:

___________________

And the sig ran away with the spoon.

leave my bad spelling alone